Comparison 6 min read

Internal vs. External Crowdsourcing: Which is Right for You?

Internal vs. External Crowdsourcing: Which is Right for You?

Crowdsourcing has emerged as a powerful tool for organisations seeking innovative solutions, improved efficiency, and fresh perspectives. But before diving in, it's essential to understand the two primary approaches: internal and external crowdsourcing. This article will compare these methods, outlining their advantages and disadvantages to help you determine the best strategy for your organisation's needs.

1. Definition and Scope

Crowdsourcing, at its core, involves outsourcing tasks or problem-solving to a large group of people. The key difference between internal and external crowdsourcing lies in who constitutes that 'crowd'.

Internal Crowdsourcing: This approach leverages the collective intelligence and skills of your existing employees. Ideas, solutions, and feedback are solicited from within the organisation, often through dedicated platforms or initiatives.
External Crowdsourcing: This involves engaging individuals outside your organisation – customers, experts, enthusiasts, or the general public – to contribute to specific tasks or challenges. This can be achieved through online platforms, competitions, or open innovation challenges. Sumocrowd can help you manage external crowdsourcing initiatives.

2. Advantages of Internal Crowdsourcing

Internal crowdsourcing offers several benefits that can be particularly valuable for organisations seeking to improve internal processes and foster a culture of collaboration.

Deep Organisational Knowledge: Employees possess a deep understanding of the organisation's processes, culture, and challenges. This insider perspective can lead to more practical and relevant solutions.
Improved Employee Engagement: Providing employees with a platform to contribute their ideas and expertise can boost morale, increase engagement, and foster a sense of ownership.
Faster Implementation: Because solutions are generated by internal stakeholders, implementation can often be faster and smoother, as there is already buy-in and familiarity with the organisation's systems.
Reduced Costs: Compared to external crowdsourcing, internal initiatives typically involve lower direct costs, as you are leveraging existing resources.
Enhanced Communication: Internal crowdsourcing can facilitate communication and collaboration across different departments and levels of the organisation.

Example:

A company looking to improve its internal communication strategy could use an internal crowdsourcing platform to gather feedback from employees on existing communication channels and solicit ideas for new approaches. This could lead to the identification of pain points and the development of more effective communication strategies.

3. Disadvantages of Internal Crowdsourcing

While internal crowdsourcing offers significant advantages, it's crucial to be aware of its potential limitations.

Limited Perspective: Relying solely on internal perspectives can lead to a lack of fresh ideas and a tendency to reinforce existing biases. The 'groupthink' phenomenon can stifle innovation.
Potential for Bias: Employees may be hesitant to challenge the status quo or offer ideas that conflict with management's views.
Lower Participation Rates: If not properly incentivised and promoted, internal crowdsourcing initiatives may suffer from low participation rates.
Implementation Challenges: Even with internal buy-in, implementing employee-generated ideas can still face challenges related to resource allocation, budget constraints, and competing priorities.
Risk of Disappointment: If employee ideas are not acknowledged or acted upon, it can lead to disillusionment and decreased engagement.

4. Advantages of External Crowdsourcing

External crowdsourcing opens up a world of possibilities by tapping into a diverse pool of talent and perspectives.

Access to a Wider Talent Pool: External crowdsourcing provides access to a vast network of individuals with diverse skills, experiences, and backgrounds, leading to more innovative and creative solutions.
Fresh Perspectives: Engaging external contributors can bring fresh perspectives and challenge existing assumptions, leading to breakthrough innovations.
Cost-Effectiveness: In some cases, external crowdsourcing can be more cost-effective than traditional methods, as you only pay for successful solutions or contributions. Consider what we offer to help manage costs.
Increased Brand Awareness: Launching external crowdsourcing campaigns can generate buzz and increase brand awareness, particularly if the challenge is engaging and relevant to the target audience.
Rapid Problem Solving: External crowdsourcing can be particularly effective for solving complex problems quickly, as you can leverage the collective intelligence of a large group of people.

Example:

A technology company seeking to develop a new mobile app could launch an external crowdsourcing competition, inviting developers and designers from around the world to submit their ideas and prototypes. This could lead to the discovery of innovative features and a faster development cycle.

5. Disadvantages of External Crowdsourcing

Despite its potential benefits, external crowdsourcing also presents certain challenges that need to be carefully considered.

Quality Control: Ensuring the quality and reliability of contributions from external sources can be challenging. Robust evaluation and selection processes are essential.
Intellectual Property Concerns: Protecting intellectual property rights can be complex when engaging external contributors. Clear agreements and legal frameworks are necessary.
Communication Barriers: Communicating effectively with a large and diverse group of external contributors can be challenging, particularly across different time zones and cultures.
Management Overhead: Managing external crowdsourcing campaigns can require significant time and resources, including defining the challenge, recruiting participants, evaluating submissions, and providing feedback.
Risk of Misinformation: In some cases, external crowdsourcing can be vulnerable to misinformation or malicious attacks. Careful monitoring and moderation are crucial.

6. Choosing the Right Approach

Selecting the right crowdsourcing approach depends on several factors, including the nature of the challenge, the organisation's resources, and its strategic goals. Here are some key considerations:

Nature of the Challenge: Is the challenge specific to the organisation's internal processes, or does it require external expertise and fresh perspectives? Internal crowdsourcing is often better suited for internal process improvements, while external crowdsourcing is more effective for generating innovative solutions or solving complex problems.
Available Resources: Does the organisation have the resources to manage an external crowdsourcing campaign, including defining the challenge, recruiting participants, evaluating submissions, and protecting intellectual property? If resources are limited, internal crowdsourcing may be a more feasible option.
Strategic Goals: What are the organisation's strategic goals for the crowdsourcing initiative? Is the goal to improve employee engagement, generate new ideas, or increase brand awareness? The choice of approach should align with these strategic goals. You can learn more about Sumocrowd and how we can help you achieve your goals.
Level of Confidentiality: Does the challenge involve sensitive information that needs to be protected? If so, internal crowdsourcing may be a safer option.

  • Desired Level of Innovation: Is the goal to generate incremental improvements or breakthrough innovations? External crowdsourcing is more likely to lead to breakthrough innovations, but it also involves greater risk.

In some cases, a hybrid approach that combines internal and external crowdsourcing may be the most effective solution. For example, an organisation could start with an internal crowdsourcing initiative to gather initial ideas and then launch an external campaign to refine and develop those ideas further. Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, and carefully considering the factors outlined above, will enable you to choose the crowdsourcing strategy that best aligns with your organisation's needs and objectives. If you have any frequently asked questions, we're here to help.

Related Articles

Comparison • 6 min

Crowdsourcing vs. Outsourcing: Key Differences and When to Use Each

Guide • 7 min

Using Crowdsourcing for Innovation: A Practical Guide

Guide • 3 min

How Crowdsourcing Works: A Comprehensive Guide

Want to own Sumocrowd?

This premium domain is available for purchase.

Make an Offer